Subsonic rounds like 45acp7/5/2023 ![]() All I would need would be the new barrel, and I have a working upper. Good point about the barrel, having the parts interchangability with regular AR's is pretty handy too. only problem being i dont have a 45 upper, so that adds to the cost significantly. It sounds like its the least hassle to get great subsonic bullets relatively cheap, and get the most destruction for the dollar. Again it would be used on deer and coyotes mostly at close range. Mostly this discussion was started for the purpose of discovering the most ideal built-for-subsonics rifle. I've used the 5.56 for deer and coyotes without problems. The AK does ok on barriers, but 5.56 is still the mac-daddy of all against rifle grade armor. As a side, im not personally not all excited about trading 5.56 performance for ak like performance in a supersonic. So im not worried about missing out on supersonic capabilty. In my case, i already have a supersonic can for the 5.56. 30cal.still suppress subs well.and give you the option of using supersonic ammo which should still suppress well, and still get your AK-like ballistics out of the rifle. If you already have a pistol can that's compatible I guess that's okay but if you're starting fresh.a. ![]() it wouldn't be a bad idea for 220gr subsīut then you're limiting yourself to subsonic ammo. 45 can and it was quieter than a 30cal can actually. There's an Osprey video of 300blk thru a. The drawback with 45 is of course trajectory and noise. There are some subsonic 300BLK loads that are claimed to expand, but they are made by small outfits and I haven't seen much proof in their claims. A 45 Gold Dot or HST will beat them every time. These fail to expand and have poor terminal ballistics. ![]() Wrong, most subsonic 300 BLK loads use bullets designed for supersonic loadings, like the 220gr OTM. The 300 blk is definetley growing on me, just wish there was some wound data to be found. I just found that you can suppress 300 with certain 9mm suppressors. Weights being roughly the same as a heavy 300blk, a 45 subsonic SEEMS like it would have a wider wound channel, but less penetration. Im thinking 300blk subsonic hollow point should perform essentially like a subsonic 147 gr 9mm hollowpoint, but with deeper penetration because of the weight. Yeah, but it also seems like the bigger 45 bore could be better in the subsonic realm, because of that wider area to crush tissue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |